8 research outputs found

    Strong chromatic index of sparse graphs

    Full text link
    A coloring of the edges of a graph GG is strong if each color class is an induced matching of GG. The strong chromatic index of GG, denoted by χs(G)\chi_{s}^{\prime}(G), is the least number of colors in a strong edge coloring of GG. In this note we prove that χs(G)(4k1)Δ(G)k(2k+1)+1\chi_{s}^{\prime}(G)\leq (4k-1)\Delta (G)-k(2k+1)+1 for every kk-degenerate graph GG. This confirms the strong version of conjecture stated recently by Chang and Narayanan [3]. Our approach allows also to improve the upper bound from [3] for chordless graphs. We get that % \chi_{s}^{\prime}(G)\leq 4\Delta -3 for any chordless graph GG. Both bounds remain valid for the list version of the strong edge coloring of these graphs

    Centroidal localization game

    Get PDF
    One important problem in a network is to locate an (invisible) moving entity by using distance-detectors placed at strategical locations. For instance, the metric dimension of a graph GG is the minimum number kk of detectors placed in some vertices {v1,,vk}\{v_1,\cdots,v_k\} such that the vector (d1,,dk)(d_1,\cdots,d_k) of the distances d(vi,r)d(v_i,r) between the detectors and the entity's location rr allows to uniquely determine rV(G)r \in V(G). In a more realistic setting, instead of getting the exact distance information, given devices placed in {v1,,vk}\{v_1,\cdots,v_k\}, we get only relative distances between the entity's location rr and the devices (for every 1i,jk1\leq i,j\leq k, it is provided whether d(vi,r)>d(v_i,r) >, <<, or == to d(vj,r)d(v_j,r)). The centroidal dimension of a graph GG is the minimum number of devices required to locate the entity in this setting. We consider the natural generalization of the latter problem, where vertices may be probed sequentially until the moving entity is located. At every turn, a set {v1,,vk}\{v_1,\cdots,v_k\} of vertices is probed and then the relative distances between the vertices viv_i and the current location rr of the entity are given. If not located, the moving entity may move along one edge. Let ζ(G)\zeta^* (G) be the minimum kk such that the entity is eventually located, whatever it does, in the graph GG. We prove that ζ(T)2\zeta^* (T)\leq 2 for every tree TT and give an upper bound on ζ(GH)\zeta^*(G\square H) in cartesian product of graphs GG and HH. Our main result is that ζ(G)3\zeta^* (G)\leq 3 for any outerplanar graph GG. We then prove that ζ(G)\zeta^* (G) is bounded by the pathwidth of GG plus 1 and that the optimization problem of determining ζ(G)\zeta^* (G) is NP-hard in general graphs. Finally, we show that approximating (up to any constant distance) the entity's location in the Euclidean plane requires at most two vertices per turn

    Localization game on geometric and planar graphs

    Get PDF
    The main topic of this paper is motivated by a localization problem in cellular networks. Given a graph GG we want to localize a walking agent by checking his distance to as few vertices as possible. The model we introduce is based on a pursuit graph game that resembles the famous Cops and Robbers game. It can be considered as a game theoretic variant of the \emph{metric dimension} of a graph. We provide upper bounds on the related graph invariant ζ(G)\zeta (G), defined as the least number of cops needed to localize the robber on a graph GG, for several classes of graphs (trees, bipartite graphs, etc). Our main result is that, surprisingly, there exists planar graphs of treewidth 22 and unbounded ζ(G)\zeta (G). On a positive side, we prove that ζ(G)\zeta (G) is bounded by the pathwidth of GG. We then show that the algorithmic problem of determining ζ(G)\zeta (G) is NP-hard in graphs with diameter at most 22. Finally, we show that at most one cop can approximate (arbitrary close) the location of the robber in the Euclidean plane
    corecore